APPEALS NOTED
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
Eli Lilly and Co. v. Apotex Inc., [2005] 2 F.C.R. 225 (F.C.), has been reversed on appeal (A‑579‑04, 2005 FCA 134), reasons for judgment handed down 13/4/05.
Maritimes and Northeast Pipeline Limited Partnership v. Elliott, [2004] 3 F.C.R. 612 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A-261-04, 2005 FCA 229), reasons for judgment handed down 14/6/05.
Martin v. Canada (Attorney General), [2004] 1 F.C.R. 625 (F.C.), has been reversed on appeal (A‑491‑03, 2005 FCA 156). The reasons for judgment handed down 6/5/05, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.
Merck Frosst Canada & Co. v. Canada (Minister of Health), [2005] 1 F.C.R. 587 (F.C.), has been reversed on appeal (A-515-04, 2005 FCA 215). The reasons for judgment handed down 7/6/05, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA
Biolyse Pharma Corp. v. Bristol‑Myers Squibb Co., [2003] 4 F.C. 505 (C.A.), was reversed by a decision dated 19/5/05 and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.
Canada (House of Commons) v. Vaid, [2003] 1 F.C. 602 (C.A.), was reversed by a decision dated 20/5/05 and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.
Esteban v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), A-374-03, Rothstein J.A., judgment dated 3/3/04, was affirmed by a decision dated 7/6/05 and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.
Medovarski v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2004] 4 F.C.R. 48 (C.A.), was affirmed by a decision dated 7/6/05 and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.
Mugesera v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2004] 1 F.C.R. 3 (C.A.), was reversed by a decision dated 28/6/05, and will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.
Applications for Leave to Appeal
Canada (Attorney General) v. Gadoury, A-209-04, 2005 FCA 14, Noël J.A., judgment dated 13/1/05, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 9/6/05.
Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Seifert, [2005] 2 F.C.R. 146 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 24/4/05.
Canada Post Corp. v. Canada (Minister of Public Works and Government Services), A‑126‑04, 2004 FCA 395, Noël J.A., judgment dated 24/11/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 19/5/05.
Froom v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2005] 2 F.C.R. 195 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 17/3/05.
Imperial Oil Ltd. v. Canada, A‑142‑04, 2004 FCA 361, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 26/10/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 19/5/05.
Inco Ltd. v. Canada, A-564-04, 2005 FCA 38, Nadon J.A., judgment dated 27/1/05 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 23/6/05.
Main Rehabilitation Co. v. Canada, A‑602‑03, 2004 FCA 403, Rothstein, Noël and Malone JJ.A., judgment dated 30/11/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 5/5/05.
Mattel Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., A-199-04, 2005 FCA 13, Noël J.A., judgment dated 12/1/05 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted 26/5/05.
Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals Canada, Inc. v. Canada (Minister of Health), [2005] 2 F.C.R. 269 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 21/4/05.
Simser v. Canada, A-284-03, 2004 FCA 414, Nadon J.A., judgment dated 7/12/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 23/6/05.
Télé-Mobile Co. v. Telecommunications Workers Union, [2005] 2 F.C.R. 727 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 30/6/05.
TELUS Communications Inc. v. Canada (Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission), [2005] 2 F.C.R. 388 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 28/4/05.