Information on Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

APPEALS NOTED

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Li v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2004] 3 F.C.R. 501 (F.C.), has been affirmed on appeal (A‑31‑04, 2005 FCA 1). The reasons for judgment handed down 5/1/05, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Applications for Leave to Appeal

AstraZeneca AB v. Apotex Inc., A‑29‑04, 2004 FCA 224, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated 9/6/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 27/1/05.

Bayer AG v. Apotex Inc., A‑546‑03, 2004 FCA 242, Rothstein J.A., judgment dated 23/6/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 20/1/05.

Brookfield Lepage Johnson Controls Facility Management Services v. Canada (Minister of Public Works and Government Services), A‑164‑03, 2004 FCA 214, Evans J.A., judgment dated 31/5/04, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 20/1/05.

Canada (Attorney General) v. Peace, A‑97‑03, 2004 FCA 56, Sexton J.A., judgment dated 5/2/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 27/1/05.

Sokolowska v. Canada, A‑529‑03, Létourneau J.A., judgment dated 24/9/04 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 27/1/05.

VIA Rail Canada Inc. v. Cairns, [2005] 1 F.C.R. 205 (C.A.), leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused 20/1/05.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.