Information on Appeals

Decision Information

Decision Content

APPEALS NOTED

FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL

Dias v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 64, [2014] F.C.R 915, has been affirmed on appeal (A-102-14, 2014 FCA 195), reasons for judgment handed down September 10, 2014.

Hupacasath First Nation v. Canada (Foreign Affairs), 2013 FC 900, [2014] 4 F.C.R. 836, has been affirmed on appeal (A-324-13, 2015 FCA 4). The reasons for judgment, handed down January 9, 2015, will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

X (Re), CSIS-30-08, 2013 FC 1275, has been affirmed on appeal (A-145-14, 2014 FCA 249), reasons for judgment handed down July 31, 2014. Both decisions will be published in the Federal Courts Reports.

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Hernandez Febles v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FCA 324, [2014] 3 F.C.R. 224, has been affirmed on appeal (2014 SCC 68). The reasons for judgment, handed down October 30, 2014, will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Meredith v. Canada (Attorney General), A-268-11, 2013 FCA 112, has been affirmed on appeal (2015 SCC 2). The reasons for judgment, handed down January 16, 2015, will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Tervita Corporation v. Canada (Commissioner of Competition), 2013 FCA 28, [2014] 2 F.C.R. 352, has been reversed on appeal (2015 SCC 3). The reasons for judgment, handed down January 22, 2015, will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Thibodeau v. Air Canada, 2012 FCA 246, [2013] 2 F.C.R. 155, has been affirmed on appeal (2014 SCC 67). The reasons for judgment, handed down October 28, 2014, will be published in the Supreme Court Reports.

Applications for leave to appeal

Abi-Mansour v. Canada (Public Service Commission), A8213, 2014 FCA 60, Mainville J.A., judgment dated March 5, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused October 9, 2014.

Apotex Inc. v. Sanofi-Aventis, A-191-12, A-193-12, A-397-12, A-474-12, 2014 FCA 68, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated March 14, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted October 30, 2014.

Burg Properties Ltd. v. Canada, A-313-13, 2014 FCA 154, Dawson J.A., judgment dated June 10, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused December 18, 2014.

Canada v. Last, A-468-12, 2014 FCA 129, Dawson J.A., judgment dated May 15, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused November 13, 2014.

Canada v. Louisbourg SBC, A-325-13, 2014 FCA 78, Blais C.J., judgment dated March 20, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused October 16, 2014.

Canada (Indian Affairs) v. Daniels, A-49-13, 2014 FCA 101, Dawson J.A., judgment dated April 17, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted November 20, 2014.

Couture v. Canada, A-155-12, 2014 FCA 35, Pelletier J.A., judgment dated February 6, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused October 23, 2014.

Edig v. Canada, A-177-14, Hollinrake v. Canada, A-182-14, Conners v. Canada, A-186-14, 2014 FCA 151, Sharlow J.A., judgment dated June 6, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused November 27, 2014.

Fotinov v. Royal Bank of Canada, A-390-13, 2014 FCA 70, Gauthier J.A., judgment dated March 18, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused September 25, 2014.

Kanthasamy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), A-27213, 2014 FCA 113, Stratas J.A., judgment dated May 2, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. granted December 4, 2014.

Klundert v. Canada, A-83-13, 2014 FCA 156, Dawson J.A., judgment dated June 16, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused December 4, 2014.

Klundert v. Canada, A-237-13, 2014 FCA 155, Dawson J.A., judgment dated June 11, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused December 4, 2014.

Malcolm v. Canada (Fisheries and Oceans), A-144-13, 2014 FCA 130, Mainville J.A., judgment dated May 20, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused November 20, 2014.

Sanchez v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), A-315-13, 2014 FCA 157, Stratas J.A., judgment dated June 10, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused November 20, 2014.

Teva Canada Limited v. Pfizer Canada Inc., A-93-14, 2014 FCA 138, Mainville J.A., judgment dated May 27, 2014, leave to appeal to S.C.C. refused November 13, 2014.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.