Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

MARITIME LAW

Insurance

Laing v. Boreal Pacific

A-166-99

Desjardins J.A.

13/10/00

5 pp.

Appeal from Trial Division decision ((1999), 163 F.T.R. 226) dismissing appellant's claim under marine insurance policy for loss of excavator following accident at sea--Respondent refused to pay any part of appellant's loss on ground appellant's vessel not seaworthy for voyage undertaken and appellant privy to unseaworthiness--Trial Judge found appellant had knowledge not only of facts making vessel unseaworthy but also "blind eye" knowledge those facts rendered vessel unseaworthy--Appeal dismissed--Trial Judge correctly applied test of privity as developed in English Court of Appeal cases Compania Maritima San Basilo S.A. v. The Oceanus Mutual Underwriting Association (Bermuda) Ltd., [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 171 and Manifest Shipping & Co. Ltd. v. Uni-Polaris Insurance Co. Ltd. and La Réunion Européenne, [1997] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 360--Evidence to support Trial Judge's conclusion.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.