Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

PENITENTIARIES

Harms v. Canada (Deputy Commissioner, Correctional Service, Pacific Region)

T-1894-99, T-1895-99

Rouleau J.

23/10/00

15 pp.

Applications for judicial review of two decisions of Assistant Deputy Commissioner approving involuntary transfer of two inmate applicants from maximum security Kent Institution to Special Handling Unit (SHU) in Quebec--Both transferred to Kent when became suspects in murder of inmate at Mission Institution--While at Kent, participated in riot by inciting other inmates, fuelling fires, obstructing firefighting--Subsequently, decision taken to transfer them to SHU--Issues whether decisions patently unreasonable and whether respondents met obligation to provide applicants with fair hearing--Applications dismissed--Applicants notified of intention to transfer them to SHU--Applicants provided with opportunity to respond to notices of involuntary transfer--Final response never received--Applicants never asked for additional information regarding allegations forming basis of recommendation to transfer and never complained about impossibility to respond due to lack of information--Applicants cannot rely on B.C.S.C. decision finding transfer from Mission to Kent unlawful as circumstances entirely different--Decision to transfer from Kent to SHU unrelated to suspicion of murder; based on applicants' behaviour during stay at Kent (participation in riot and numerous other offences)--Respondents not compelled to deliver any further information to applicants--Information provided sufficient--Explanations provided to Court should and could have been provided much earlier, before actual decision made.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.