Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Judicial Review

Keating v. Canada (Minister of Fisheries and Oceans)

T-1986-01

2002 FCT 1174, Heneghan J.

13/11/02

24 pp.

Judicial review of Minister's refusal to reinstate applicant's crab licence--Applicant argued respondent violated principles of natural justice in denying appeal--Minister of Fisheries and Oceans has absolute discretion over issuance of fishing licences--Discretion restricted only by requirements of natural justice--Whether respondent exercised discretion in accordance with requirements of natural justice--Respondent considered criticism from others in fishing industry in order to make decision--Not proper consideration in deciding how to exercise a statutory discretion--Decision-maker does not act fairly when basing decision on desire to quiet criticism of others--Letter from respondent not clearly demonstrating decision in question made without regard to irrelevant factor --Applying Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 817, natural justice requiring decision-maker to provide adequate reasons for decision-- Reasonable apprehension that respondent relied on extraneous and irrelevant matters in reaching decision--Requirements of natural justice not respected by respondent in making decision --Application for judicial review allowed--Decision of respondent quashed and matter remitted to respondent for consideration in accordance to requirements of natural justice.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.