Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Status in Canada

Permanent Residents

Bola v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

IMM-4532-00

2002 FCT 716, Campbell J.

25/6/02

5 pp.

Application for judicial review of visa officer's decision determining applicant not dependent son as defined in Immigration Regulations, 1978, s. 2--Applicant 26 years old, enrolled in three-year bachelor program since 1992-- Completed first year but, from 1994 to 1999, continuously failed second year--Applicant indicated had attended only seven English classes in seven years--Applicant admitted primary reason for enrolment to play for school's soccer team --College readmitted him despite poor academic performance in order to keep him on team--Visa officer entitled to embark on qualitative assessment of student's attendance: Sandhu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2002] 3 F.C. 280 (C.A.)--However, here, visa officer's qualitative assessment focussed exclusively on applicant's knowledge of English--Application allowed--Visa officer not entitled to rely on applicant's knowledge of only one subject, the one subject applicant repeatedly failed--Facts of case indicating applicant in fact in full-time attendance at school--While may not have attended all classes, fulfilled expectations of school through his commitment to college's soccer team--Visa officer's decision made without regard to evidence before her --In given fact situation, might very well be necessary for visa officer to determine worth of student's contribution to education institution attended--This can only be done by asking for information about value institution places on student's efforts--Here, seems, on evidence, academic institution placed great value on applicant's attendance because of his excellence in soccer--Credit should be given to him for recognized skill, perseverance to continue with his attendance for years described--Visa officer erred in focussing solely on part of applicant's academic performance to exclusion of all else--On evidence, applicant honest, hard- working youth who did what academic institution expected of him.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.