Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

FOOD AND DRUGS

Delisle v. Canada (Attorney General)

T-698-04

2004 FC 788, Tremblay-Lamer J.

31/5/04

7 pp.

Motion for interlocutory order requiring respondents to allow requests for special access to drug 714-X made by physicians, without further requirements, conditions, within 24 hours of receipt of such requests for access--In 1989, applicant diagnosed with disease of immune system called mastocytosis, rare disease for which as yet no medication-- Food and Drug Regulations (Regulations), s. C.08.010 creating discretionary authority, not obligation, to issue authorizations for special access--Applicant asked Court to order respondents to issue authorizations for special access-- Obvious relief sought by applicant mandamus--Court may, in context of application for mandamus, order performance of public duty but cannot dictate appropriate result when authority conferred by enabling provision discretionary-- Issuance of writ of mandamus not possible in such circumstances, for it would constitute in fact interim declara-tion of right--Moreover, Court cannot order respondents to allow requests for access to 714-X "without further requirements or conditions", for such order would violate provisions of Regulations which stipulate conditions that must be met by physician requesting access before Director General can exercise discretion--Motion dismissed--Food and Drug Regulations, C.R.C., c. 870, s. C.08.010.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.