Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

Status in Canada

Brovina v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

IMM-2427-03

2004 FC 635, Layden-Stevenson J.

29/4/04

9 pp.

Judicial review of Immigration and Refugee Board's decision finding applicant not personally in danger in Albania, should have no difficulty upon return since son, wife staying in Canada--Applicant said Board made errors--Although arguments interesting from academic perspective, facts of case not supporting them--First alleged error Board failed to consider "compelling reasons" exception under Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, s. 108--Board did not find applicant suffered past persecution--For Board to embark on compelling reasons analysis, it must first find valid refugee (or protected person) claim, reasons for claim ceased to exist due to changed country conditions--Second argument Board failed to make finding on past persecution--Argument relates to first--While Board did not expressly state she did not experience past persecution, finding implicit in reasons-- Applicant also arguing Board erred in relation to burden of proof as finding, on balance of probabilities, no serious possibility applicant would be targeted for persecution-- Argument academic--Regardless of standard of proof, it could have made no difference to findings herein--Last, applicant submitting incumbent on Board to conduct separate analysis under Act, s. 97--Arguing unless Board decision turns on credibility (not case here), it must conduct separate s. 97 analysis--Authorities not demanding s. 97 analysis be performed in every case--Question must be reviewed on case- by-case basis--Thus, while separate s. 97 analysis desirable, failure to conduct such analysis not fatal in circumstances where no evidence requiring it--Board did conduct brief analysis relating to s. 97 risk when finding "no reason to believe" applicant would face any risk in returning to Albania--No objective evidence before Board that might have led to any other conclusion--Application dismissed-- Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, S.C. 2001, c. 27, ss. 97, 108.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.