Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Legault v. Canada ( Secretary of State )

IMM-7485-93

McGillis J.

17/1/95

9 pp.

Application for judicial review of adjudicator's finding of reasonable grounds for belief applicant committing offences under U.S. law pursuant to Act, s. 19(1)(c.1)(ii) -- Applicant, citizen of U.S. marrying Canadian citizen and admitted to Canada as visitor -- Application for extradition on ground applicant committed fraud in U.S. dismissed by Superior Court of Quebec-U.S. grand jury returning true bill of indictment for conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud, fraud, falsely making bill of lading and use of fictitious names -- Application for permanent resident status in Canada for applicant refused -- Inquiry directed and subsequently adjourned without any evidence adduced -- Second inquiry directed pursuant to amended Act during which Minister tendered in evidence certified copy of U.S. warrant for arrest and indictment -- No questions with respect to allegations asked of appellant other than amount of alleged fraud -- In basing decision solely on allegations in indictment returned by grand jury, adjudicator finding reasonable grounds to believe applicant committed offences -- Reasonable grounds creating lower standard of proof than balance of probabilities -- Grand jury entitled to return true bill of indictment after hearing sworn evidence and determining existence of probable cause to believe crime committed-Contents of warrant for arrest and indictment not constituting evidence of commission of alleged offenses -- Adjudicator erred in law in finding, on basis of documents, existence of reasonable grounds applicant committed offenses -- Adjudicator erred in law by failing to make independent determination on basis of evidence-Termination of inquiry and commencement of new proceedings under amended Act not constituting abuse of process -- Application allowed-Immigration Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. I-2, s. 19(1)(c.1)(ii) (as enacted by S.C. 1992, c. 49, s. 11).

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.