HUMAN RIGHTS
Appeal from F.C. decision (2005 FC 401) allowing judicial review of decision by Canadian Human Rights Commission on ground Commission failed to observe rules of procedural fairness— Appeal allowed—By adopting investigator’s recommendation, after indicating had reviewed investigator’s report, Commission approved reasons given by investigator—This report explained to complainant why complaint deemed inadmissible—That explanation consistent with rules of procedural fairness and Commission’s obligation to set out reasons for decision pursuant to s. 42(1) of Canadian Human Rights Act—Canadian Human Rights Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. H‑6, s. 42(1).
Canada (Attorney General) v. Public Service Alliance of Canada (A‑171‑05, 2005 FCA 413, Noël J.A., judgment dated 12/12/05, 6 pp.)