Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Bernal v. Canada ( Minister of Employment and Immigration )

92-T-2103

Reed J.

22/9/93

4 pp.

Application for leave to appeal-During cross-examination Immigration Refugee Board member asking "Do we have a war going on, is there a battle, are we playing darts, what is going on?" -- In reasons finding no credible basis to refugee claim, member commenting hearing began with applicant's attitude being one of "male macho pride" in story -- Applicant alleging comments demonstrating bias as first indicating member treating violence in Columbia flippantly, and second demonstrating sexist, sarcastic attitude -- Application denied -- No difference between comments denigrating or trivializing males and those denigrating or trivializing females, but on totality of evidence applicant not having arguable case -- While both remarks inappropriate, transcript indicating first uttered in frustration to applicant's unresponsiveness and evasiveness -- Second remark commenting on applicant's demeanour, attitude towards Board -- Demonstrating bias neither towards males in general nor towards particular applicant because male -- Remarks not raising apprehension of bias in mind of reasonably knowledgeable person -- Merely intemperate outburst of frustration -- Although unusual to give written reasons for denial of leave to appeal, prepared herein to ensure applicant and counsel knowing argument regarding equal application of gender bias rules carefully considered.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.