Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Mohamud v. Canada ( Minister of Employment and Immigration )

A-614-92

Nadon J.

21/1/94

5 pp.

Application for judicial review of Convention Refugee Determination Division decision applicant not Convention refugee -- Applicant citizen of Somalia -- Claiming refugee status based on membership in particular social group i.e. Warsengali sub-clan of Darod tribe -- Board holding claimant's fear felt indiscriminately by all citizens of Somalia as consequence of civil war, and not felt exclusively by claimant because Darod -- Applicant submitting Board erred in law in holding in civil war context fear of persecution must be felt "exclusively" by claimant because Darod to qualify as Convention refugee -- Alleging misinterpretation of law enunciated in Salibian v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1990] 3 F.C. 250 (C.A.), which contemplates all citizens having well-founded fear of persecution in civil war context if fear related to other grounds in Convention refugee definition -- Application dismissed -- Degree of requisite targeting implied by Board no more specific than accepted in Salibian -- Indiscriminate fear insufficient -- Board must still be able to attribute fear of persecution to one of grounds enumerated in Immigration Act, s. 2 to declare applicant Convention refugee -- Evidence before Board of general and indiscriminate shelling, bombing of cities, villages in Somalia -- Board not convinced applicant in different position from that of all Somalis in Mogadishu by reason of membership in Darod tribe -- Decision should not be reviewed -- Abdi v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), A-871-92, Reed J., judgment dated 8/10/93, 3 pp., not yet reported, wherein negative decision of Refugee Division set aside, distinguished -- There Refugee Division holding no evidence before it demonstrating applicant and members of Warsengali sub-clan targeted by U.S.C. forces -- Trial Judge holding finding of "no evidence" made without regard to material before it, specifically two publications part of documentary evidence before Board tending to corroborate applicant's position -- Those documents not part of present record and could not be considered by Board -- Documentary record not containing any materials supporting applicant's position -- Immigration Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. I-2, s. 2 (as am. by R.S.C., 1985 (4th Supp.), c. 28, s. 1).

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.