Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Walls v. Canada

T-3308-90 / T-3309-90

Pinard J.

2/2/96

10 pp.

Appeals with respect to 1984 and 1985 taxation years-Four cases heard on same evidence-Partnership (plaintiffs both limited partners thereof) acquiring mini-warehouse for $ 2,200,000 with interest payable at 24% per annum-Registration on same day as registration of previous sale for $ 1,180,000-Partnership generated losses on mini-warehouse, allocated to partners on pro rata basis and plaintiffs deducted proportionate share of losses for income tax purposes-Minister reassessed plaintiffs for 1984 and 1985 taxation years, reducing partnership's losses by reducing purchase price of mini-warehouse from $2,200,000 to $1,180,000 on basis latter fair market value-Appeals from above reassessments-Appeals dismissed-No reasonable expectation of profit-Moldowan v. The Queen, [1978] 1 S.C.R. 480 applied-Key factor to be considered: capability of venture as capitalized to show profit after charging capital cost allowance-Herein, even before charging of capital cost allowance, storage park assured of large losses in first three years and reasonable to expect losses would continue thereafter, although to reduced extent-Main factor in initial large losses interest payable on agreement for sale set at $2,199,999 on purchase price of $2,200,000-Only means of reducing interest payments on agreement for sale would have been to pay down amount owing, which would have required additional capital-Partnership unable to make profit as effectively under capitalized-No plan existed to raise additional capital to reduce debts of partnership-Inability of venture as capitalized to show profit, even before taking capital cost allowance, clear indication partnership did not have reasonable expectation of profit-As for other criteria: as storage park "going operation" at time purchased by partnership in 1983, no basis for claiming losses incurred related to start-up period-Given all circumstances, partnership did not carry on business with reasonable expectation of profit-Rather, set up as tax shelter, with intention operation of storage park would give rise to large initial losses in order to provide limited partners with tax claims-Reduction of tax herein sole reason for existence of shelter.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.