Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

Semiahmoo Indian Band v. Canada

T-1878-90

Reed J.

28/9/95

7 pp.

Whether defendant breached fiduciary duty to plaintiffs in requiring surrender of part of latter's reserve-Surrender taking place in 1951-Department of Public Works considering expansion of customs facilities located near plaintiffs' reserve-Land surrendered remaining in hands of defendant ever since-Reserve allocated to Band in 1889, comprising 382 acres-Close to Canada-U.S. border-Band knew defendant, at all times, had right to expropriate land for public purposes if Band refused to surrender-Price agreed upon $550 per acre-Price paid not below market value-No condition attached to surrender land to be returned to Band if not used for customs facility-Price paid indicating intention to effect absolute surrender, not conditional surrender-Land not all used for customs purposes-No express or implied reversionary term as part of surrender-Breach of fiduciary duty by defendant vis-à-vis Band-More land taken than required-Much of it remaining unused by Crown-Taking not conditional-Obligation on fiduciary to condition taking by reversionary provision, or ensure by other mechanism least possible impairment of plaintiffs' rights occurs-Breach of fiduciary duty owed to plaintiffs-British Columbia Limitation Act applicable herein-Breach of fiduciary duty not continuing-Six-year limitation period, thirty-year ultimate limitation period under Act requiring dismissal of plaintiffs' claim-Judgment in favour of defendant-Limitation Act, R.S.B.C. 1979, c. 236.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.