Digests

Decision Information

Decision Content

North American Gateway Inc. v. Canada ( Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission )

97-A-47

McDonald J.A.

26/5/97

8 pp.

Application for stay of Decision 97-10 of Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), and of CRTC's interlocutory decision-CRTC's decision contentious as relating to prohibition of switched hubbing for long distance overseas phone calls-Teleglobe Canada currently having de facto monopoly as facilities-based provider of overseas telecommunications-Applicant North American Gateway Inc. (NAG) also providing international telephone service-Decision 97-10 making it explicit switched hubbing not permitted without Teleglobe's consent-On application for stay, Court must apply tripartite test laid out by S.C.C.: serious issue to be tried, irreparable harm, balance of convenience favouring applicant-Threshold of "serious issue to be tried" low one-Since decisions of S.C.C. in Manitoba (Attorney General) v. Metropolitan Stores Ltd., [1987] 1 S.C.R. 110 and RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 311, threshold much lower: applicant need only satisfy Court matter on appeal neither frivolous nor vexatious-Lower threshold most often applied in Charter cases, where fundamental issues of public policy at stake-Same low threshold applied by Court in non-Charter cases-Where Court asked to review decision of party vested with public interest like CRTC, lower standard of "frivolous or vexatious" should apply-Low threshold met by applicant-Higher standard than that of "neither frivolous nor vexatious" also met by applicant-Issues raised by applicant presenting at least one if not several serious issues to be tried-Applicant will suffer irreparable harm if stay not granted-NAG could be out of business within days as major customers seek to comply with Decision 97-10-Harm to NAG virtually incapable of being compensated via later award of damages-No entity liable to compensate for damages-No evidence before Court as to how Teleglobe would be harmed by granting of stay-Teleglobe Canada enjoying healthy profits during period NAG engaged in switched hubbing-Balance of convenience in favour of applicant-That applicant could be put out of business heavy burden for those adverse in interest to outweigh-Application allowed-Tracking provisions put in place by CRTC's interim ruling of August 13, 1996 to be continued-Accounting provisions to be continued as well pending disposition of application for leave to appeal filed with Court.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.