T-1780-77 
William and Tabitha Smith (Plaintiffs) 
v. 
The Queen and the Attorney General of Canada 
(Defendants) 
Trial Division, Mahoney J.—Vancouver, October 
24, 25 and 27; Ottawa, November 4, 1977. 
Jurisdiction — Prerogative writs — Writ of quo warranto 
sought re Yukon magistrate's authority — Magistrate 
appointed pursuant to territorial ordinance — Ordinance's 
legislative competence in turn due to Yukon Act — Whether or 
not territorial magistrate's court a federal tribunal and there
fore within Federal Court's jurisdiction — Federal Court Act, 
R.S.C. 1970 (2nd Supp.), c. 10, s. 18 Magistrate's Court 
Ordinance, O.Y.T. 1971 (1st), c. 10 — Yukon Act, R.S.C. 
1970, c. Y-2, as amended by R.S.C. 1970 (1st Supp.), c. 48, ss. 
6 and 12, and SOR/71-130 — Interpretation Act, R.S.C. 1970, 
c. 1-23. 
APPLICATION. 
COUNSEL: 
W. Smith for himself and Tabitha Smith. 
J. R. Haig for defendants. 
SOLICITORS: 
W. Smith, Old Crow, for himself and Tabitha 
Smith. 
Deputy Attorney General of Canada for 
defendants. 
The following are the reasons for judgment 
rendered in English by 
MAHONEY J.: The plaintiffs seek a writ of quo 
warranto in respect of the authority of one Wil-
liam Pierce and others generally to act, in Her 
Majesty's name, as magistrates of the Magistrate's 
Court of the Yukon Territory. The defendants 
have, by leave, entered a conditional appearance 
for the purpose of questioning this Court's jurisdic
tion to entertain the action. 
The magistrates in issue are appointed by the 
Commissioner of the Yukon Territory pursuant to 
the Magistrate's Court Ordinance' which, in turn, 
I O.Y.T. 1971 (1st), c. 10. 
would appear to be within the legislative compe
tence of the Territorial Council only by virtue of 
paragraph 16(i) of the Yukon Act 2 . 
Under section 18 of the Federal Court Act 3 , this 
Court has exclusive jurisdiction to grant the relief 
sought if these magistrates fall within the defini
tion of "federal board, commission or other tribu
nal" in the Federal Court Act, which is: 
2. In this Act 
"federal board, commission or other tribunal" means any body 
or any person or persons having, exercising or purporting to 
exercise jurisdiction or powers conferred by or under an Act 
of the Parliament of Canada, other than any such body 
constituted or established by or under a law of a province or 
any such person or persons appointed under or in accordance 
with a law of a province or under section 96 of The British 
North America Act, 1867; 
The powers and jurisdiction of these magistrates 
may be conferred under an Act of the Parliament 
of Canada, the Yukon Act, but their court is 
constituted and they are appointed under an Ordi
nance of the Council of the Yukon Territory. 
The Interpretation Act 4 provides: 
28. In every enactment 
"province" means a province of Canada, and includes the 
Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories; 
That, of course, applies to the Federal Court Act. 
The magistrates of the Magistrate's Court of the 
Yukon Territory, in general, and William Pierce, 
in particular, are not, by definition, a "federal 
board, commission or other tribunal" by reason of 
the express exclusion from that term of a body 
constituted and persons appointed under the law of 
a province. This Court has no jurisdiction to enter
tain the action. 
JUDGMENT 
The action is dismissed with costs. 
a R.S.C. 1970, c. Y-2, as amended by R.S.C. 1970 (1st 
Supp.), c. 48, ss. 6 and 12 and SOR/71-130. 
3 R.S.C. 1970 (2nd Supp.), c. 10. 
4 R.S.C. 1970, c. I-23. 
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.